Assessment of Diagnostic Specificity of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Tests and Their Application for Monitoring of Seroconversion and Stability of Antiviral Antibody Response in Healthcare Workers in Moscow

3Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing is an efficient tool to assess the proportion of seropositive population due to infection and/or vaccination. Numerous test systems utilizing various antigen composition(s) are routinely used for detection and quantitation of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. We determined their diagnostic specificity using archived true-negative samples collected before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Using test systems demonstrating 98.5–100% specificity, we assessed the dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion and durability of anti-spike (S) antibodies in healthcare professionals (n = 100) working in Moscow during the first two cycles of the pandemic (May 2020 to June 2021) outside of the “red zone”. Analysis revealed a rapid increase in anti-SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity from 19 to 80% (19/100 and 80/100, respectively) due to virus exposition/infection; only 16.3% of seroconversion cases (13/80) were due to vaccination, but not the virus exposure, although massive COVID-19 vaccination of healthcare workers was performed beginning in December 2020. In total, 12.7% (8/63) remained positive for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM for >6 months, indicating unsuitability of IgM for identification of newly infected individuals. All except one remained seropositive for anti-S antibodies for >9 months on average. Significant (>15%) declines in anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody concentrations were observed in only 18% of individuals (9/50). Our data on the high seropositivity rate and stability of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels in healthcare personnel working outside of the “red zone” indicate their regular exposition to SARS-CoV-2/an increased risk of infection, while a low frequency of vaccine-induced antibody response acquired after the start of vaccination points to vaccine hesitancy.

References Powered by Scopus

The species Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2

5432Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in Spain (ENE-COVID): a nationwide, population-based seroepidemiological study

1248Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2-Specific Antibody Responses in Coronavirus Disease Patients

1136Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Comparative immunogenicity and safety of Gam-COVID-Vac and Sinopharm BBIBP-CorV vaccines: results of a pilot clinical study

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Is There a Future for Traditional Immunogens When We Have mRNA?

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Intensity and duration of the humoral immune response to the COVID-19 vaccine in healthcare workers, using a quantitative IgG antibody test

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kichatova, V. S., Asadi Mobarkhan, F. A., Potemkin, I. A., Zlobin, S. P., Perfilieva, O. M., Valuev-Elliston, V. T., … Kyuregyan, K. K. (2022). Assessment of Diagnostic Specificity of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Tests and Their Application for Monitoring of Seroconversion and Stability of Antiviral Antibody Response in Healthcare Workers in Moscow. Microorganisms, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10020429

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

43%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

29%

Researcher 2

29%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 3

50%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

17%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

17%

Social Sciences 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free