Spinal cord injuries: Principles and methods for outcome assessment

4Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Animal models are indispensable for research on central nervous system disorders and particularly relevant and useful in spinal cord injury (SCI) research. In contrast to neurodegenerative diseases, trauma inflicted to animals is inherently similar (albeit not identical) to the situation after trauma in human beings. There are still many factors to consider when the choice of animal model is to be made. How should the injury be induced? At what segmental level? Which parameters can be evaluated? Ultimately, the purpose of the study should be defined before an animal model is chosen. Assessing acute and chronic structural changes, studying motor and sensory functions after injury, and evaluating treatments such as protective drugs or substances enhancing regeneration all place different demands on the animal model and how results from the model are interpreted. With a focus on small animal (rodent) models of SCI, we give a background on pathology and pathophysiology, review the most common rodent injury models and functional tests used, present examples of experimental studies using various methods, and discuss difficulties in translating results from animal models to the clinical situation. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Åkesson, E., Calzarossa, C., & Sundström, E. (2013). Spinal cord injuries: Principles and methods for outcome assessment. Neuromethods, 76, 273–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-197-4_13

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free