Community pharmacist interventions in a capitated pharmacy benefit contract

25Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Documented interventions associated with processing prescriptions in a managed care environment were analyzed, and a benchmark for interventions was proposed. A retrospective analysis of documented interventions by 31 pharmacies contracted by a managed care organization to serve 22,000 Medi- Cal patients was undertaken. An intervention consisted of identifying any problem related to a prescription, taking action, and recording the problem, action, and outcome on a form. Problems were categorized as drug selection issues, clinical issues, errors in prescription writing, and patient education issues. A similar process was followed for describing actions and outcomes. The data were used as an indicator of prescription-related problems in contemporary pharmacies in a managed care environment; data from another study were used as an indicator of 'ideal' pharmacist performance in detecting and resolving problems. The estimated intervention rate when pharmacists meeting ideal performance expectations worked in a managed care environment was set as a benchmark. The economic impact of drug selection interventions was determined as well. Data were retrieved and compiled from 595 (93.4%) of 637 interventions performed in 1995, when 93,483 contract- related prescriptions were processed by the 31 pharmacies. Fifty percent of problems related to drug selection issues. The most frequent action was contacting the prescriber (56.1%). The overall intervention rate was 0.7% (range, 0-4.1%). It was estimated that 4% of prescriptions would require an intervention; two pharmacies met this level. Interventions resulting in prescription change realized an average decrease in cost of 65.8%. Community pharmacies under contract with a managed care organization intervened on 0.7% of prescriptions, but the rate of intervention across pharmacies was inconsistent, ranging from 0% to 4.1%; a benchmark of 4% would be reasonable.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Knapp, K. K., Katzman, H., Hambright, J. S., & Albrant, D. H. (1998). Community pharmacist interventions in a capitated pharmacy benefit contract. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 55(11), 1141–1145. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/55.11.1141

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free