Evaluation of newspaper articles for coverage of public reporting data: A case study of unadjusted cancer survival data

3Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The Japanese Association of Clinical Cancer Centers recently published the unadjusted 5-year survival rates of patients receiving care at each facility. A primary concern is that the media may cover this topic differently than originally intended. We examined all 13 newspaper articles that addressed the topic to assess their coverage of the public reporting program's key points, which were identified through interviews with the leader of the program. On average, 4.5 of the 10 key points identified were at least superficially covered. Although most articles mentioned the incomparability of the unadjusted data, eight created comparative tables that listed the survival data across facilities and seven sorted the facilities in descending order of survival. Four articles provided potentially misleading descriptions about the use of the relative survival. We concluded that caution is required because newspaper reports may convey potentially contradicting messages and technical details may be described inaccurately. © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Higashi, T., Nakamura, F., Saruki, N., Takegami, M., Hosokawa, T., Fukuhara, S., … Sobue, T. (2013). Evaluation of newspaper articles for coverage of public reporting data: A case study of unadjusted cancer survival data. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 43(1), 95–100. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hys190

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free