Capital expenditures and firm performance: evidence from a cross-sectional analysis of stock returns

17Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Using a simple two-period model of investment, we show that there should be a nonlinear relation between a firm's investment-to-capital ratio and its subsequent stock returns. This prediction finds substantial empirical support. The evidence indicates that the slope of the investment function is negative at low investment levels, close to zero at intermediate investment levels and negative at high investment levels. Our results, which are robust to the use of narrowly- and broadly-defined measures of capital investment, pose a challenge to the hypothesis that the negative cross-sectional correlation between investment and stock returns is attributable to some sort of overinvestment phenomenon.

References Powered by Scopus

The Cross‐Section of Expected Stock Returns

8594Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

On persistence in mutual fund performance

8494Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency

5579Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Do capital expenditures influence earnings performance: Evidence from loss-making firms

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effects of family ownership and family management on the performance of entrepreneurial firms

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Effects of Competitive Environment and Strategic Factors on US Firm Performance Before and After the Global Financial Crisis

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cordis, A. S., & Kirby, C. (2017). Capital expenditures and firm performance: evidence from a cross-sectional analysis of stock returns. Accounting and Finance, 57(4), 1019–1042. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12193

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 20

77%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

19%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 17

61%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9

32%

Social Sciences 1

4%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free