Less entanglement exhibiting more nonlocality with noisy measurements

2Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The Clauser–Horne–Shimony–Holt (CHSH) inequality test is widely used as a mean of invalidating the local deterministic theories. Most attempts to experimentally test nonlocality have presumed unphysical idealizations that do not hold in real experiments, namely, noiseless measurements. We demonstrate an experimental violation of the CHSH inequality that is free of idealization and rules out local models with high confidence. We show that the CHSH inequality can always be violated for any nonzero noise parameter of the measurement. Intriguingly, less entanglement exhibits more nonlocality in the CHSH test with noisy measurements. Furthermore, we theoretically propose and experimentally demonstrate how the CHSH test with noisy measurements can be used to detect weak entanglement on two-qubit states. Our results offer a deeper insight into the relation between entanglement and nonlocality.

References Powered by Scopus

Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels

12080Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?

11807Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quantum cryptography based on Bellâs theorem

9116Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Experimental Demonstration of Quantum Pseudotelepathy

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Experimental witnessing for entangled states with limited local measurements

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhu, G., Dilley, D., Wang, K., Xiao, L., Chitambar, E., & Xue, P. (2021). Less entanglement exhibiting more nonlocality with noisy measurements. Npj Quantum Information, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-021-00506-y

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

86%

Researcher 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Physics and Astronomy 6

75%

Engineering 1

13%

Chemistry 1

13%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 13

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0