The diverse nature of island isolation and its effect on land bridge insular faunas

22Citations
Citations of this article
64Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aim: Isolation is a key factor in island biology. It is usually defined as the distance to the geographically nearest mainland, but many other definitions exist. We explored how testing different isolation indices affects the inference of impacts of isolation on faunal characteristics. We focused on land bridge islands and compared the relationships of many spatial and temporal (i.e., through time) isolation indices with community-, population- and individual-level characteristics (species richness, population density and body size, respectively). Location: Aegean Sea islands, Greece. Time period: Current. Taxon: Many animal taxa. Methods: We estimated 21 isolation indices for 205 islands and recorded species richness data for 15 taxa (invertebrates and vertebrates). We obtained body size data for seven lizard species and population density data for three. We explored how well indices predict each characteristic, in each taxon, by conducting a series of ordinary least squares regressions (controlling for island area when needed) and a meta-analysis. Results: Isolation was significantly (and negatively) associated with species richness in 10 of 15 taxa. It was significantly (and positively) associated with body size in only one of seven species and was not associated with population density. The effect of isolation on species richness was much weaker than that of island area, regardless of the index tested. Spatial indices generally out-performed temporal indices, and indices directly related to the mainland out-performed those related mainly to neighbouring islands. No index was universally superior to others, including the distance to the geographically nearest mainland. Main conclusions: The choice of index can alter our perception of the impacts of isolation on biological patterns. The nearly automatic, ubiquitous use of distance to the geographically nearest mainland misrepresents the complexity of the effects of isolation. We recommend the simultaneous testing of several indices that represent different aspects of isolation, in order to produce more constructive and thorough investigations and avoid imprecise inference.

References Powered by Scopus

A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors

6883Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Relative importance for linear regression in R: The package relaimpo

2071Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Energy, water, and broad-scale geographic patterns of species richness

1959Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Snapshot isolation and isolation history challenge the analogy between mountains and islands used to understand endemism

56Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Ecological Opportunity from Innovation, not Islands, Drove the Anole Lizard Adaptive Radiation

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Island Biogeography: Geo-environmental Dynamics, Ecology, Evolution, Human Impact, and Conservation

23Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Itescu, Y., Foufopoulos, J., Pafilis, P., & Meiri, S. (2020). The diverse nature of island isolation and its effect on land bridge insular faunas. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 29(2), 262–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13024

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 18

58%

Researcher 10

32%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

6%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21

58%

Environmental Science 9

25%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 3

8%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 3

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0