APPROACHES TO GRADUATE ATTRIBUTES AND CONTINUAL IMPROVEMENT PROCESSES IN FACULTIES OF ENGINEERING ACROSS CANADA: A NARRATIVE REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

  • Parker A
  • Watson E
  • Ivey M
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The CEAB accreditation requirement of graduate attributes and continual improvement processes (GACIP) has been a pervasive topic in the annual CEEA conference proceedings since 2010. The proceedings are a rich primary source of work being done in Canadian tertiary institutions. This narrative review of the literature consolidates and discusses the relevant CEEA papers for 2010-2017 in a manner that is useful to leadership and decision-makers at accredited faculties of Engineering nationwide. Four guiding research questions were asked of this literature: (1) What general frameworks are being implemented as accredited faculties of Engineering across Canada approach GACIP?; (2) What are the specific activities and methods of one or more of the GACIP steps?; (3) What are the roles and responsibilities of people involved?; and (4) What perspectives are taken in response to the CEAB accreditation criteria, including concerns, issues, and benefits? A qualitative content analysis was conducted on 106 papers meeting selection criteria. Emergent topics were used to form the discussion.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Parker, A. M., Watson, E., Ivey, M., & Carey, J. P. (2019). APPROACHES TO GRADUATE ATTRIBUTES AND CONTINUAL IMPROVEMENT PROCESSES IN FACULTIES OF ENGINEERING ACROSS CANADA: A NARRATIVE REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA). https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.vi0.13736

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free