Using surrogate weights for handling preference strength in multi-criteria decisions

5Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Various proposals for how to eliminate some of the obstacles in multi-criteria decision making exist and methods for introducing so called surrogate weights have proliferated for some time in the form of ordinal ranking methods for the criteria weights. Considering the decision quality, one main problem is that the input information to ordinal methods is often too restricted. At the same time, decision-makers often possess more background information, for example regarding the relative strengths of the criteria, and might want to use that. Thus, some form of strength relation often exists that can be utilised when transforming orderings into weights. In this article, using a quite extensive simulation approach, we suggest a thorough testing methodology and analyse the relevance of a set of ordering methods including to what extent these improve the efficacy of rank order weights and provide a reasonable base for decision making.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Danielson, M., & Ekenberg, L. (2015). Using surrogate weights for handling preference strength in multi-criteria decisions. In Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing (Vol. 218, pp. 107–118). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19515-5_9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free