Northwestern University Flexible Subischial Vacuum Socket for persons with transfemoral amputation-Part 1: Description of technique

28Citations
Citations of this article
131Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Current transfemoral prosthetic sockets restrict function, lack comfort, and cause residual limb problems. Lower proximal trim lines are an appealing way to address this problem. Development of a more comfortable and possibly functional subischial socket may contribute to improving quality of life of persons with transfemoral amputation. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to (1) describe the design and fabrication of a new subischial socket and (2) describe efforts to teach this technique. Study design: Development project. Methods: Socket development involved defining the following: subject and liner selection, residual limb evaluation, casting, positive mold rectification, check socket fitting, definitive socket fabrication, and troubleshooting of socket fit. Three hands-on workshops to teach the socket were piloted and attended by 30 certified prosthetists and their patient models. Results: Patient models responded positively to the comfort, range of motion, and stability of the new socket while prosthetists described the technique as “straight forward, reproducible.” Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to create a teachable subischial socket, and while it appears promising, more definitive evaluation is needed. Clinical relevance: We developed the Northwestern University Flexible Subischial Vacuum (NU-FlexSIV) Socket as a more comfortable alternative to current transfemoral sockets and demonstrated that it could be taught successfully to prosthetists.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fatone, S., & Caldwell, R. (2017). Northwestern University Flexible Subischial Vacuum Socket for persons with transfemoral amputation-Part 1: Description of technique. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 41(3), 237–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309364616685229

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 30

61%

Researcher 12

24%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

8%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 25

36%

Medicine and Dentistry 24

34%

Nursing and Health Professions 19

27%

Materials Science 2

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free