Small sample size performance of evolutionary algorithms for adaptive image retrieval

1Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We evaluate the small sample size (SSS) performance of evolutionary algorithms (EAs) for relevance feedback (RP) in image retrieval. We focus on the requirement to learn the user's information need based on a small - between 2 and 25 - number of positive and negative training images. Despite this being a fundamental requirement, none of the existing works dealing with EAs for RF systematically evaluates their SSS performance. To address this issue, we compare four variants of EAs for RF. Common for all variants is the hierarchical, region-based image similarity model, with region and feature weights as parameters. The difference between the variants is in the objective function of the EA used to adjust the model parameters. The objective functions include: (O-l) precision; (O-2) average rank; (O-3) ratio of within-class (i.e., positive images) and between-class (i.e., positive and negative images) scatter; and (O-4) combination of O-2 and O-3. We note that unlike O-l and O-2 - O-3 and O-4 are not used in any of the existing works dealing with EAs for RF. The four variants are evaluated on five test databases, containing 61,895 general-purpose images, in 619 semantic categories. Results of the evaluation reveal that variants with objective functions O-3 and O-4 consistently outperform those with O-l and O-2. Furthermore, comparison with the representative of the existing RF methods shows that EAs are both effective and efficient approaches for SSS learning in region-based image retrieval. © Springer-Verlag 2004.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stejić, Z., Takama, Y., & Hirota, K. (2004). Small sample size performance of evolutionary algorithms for adaptive image retrieval. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 3115, 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27814-6_10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free