Effect of rheumatologist education on systematic measurements and treatment decisions in rheumatoid arthritis: The metrix study

10Citations
Citations of this article
78Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective. To determine whether an educational intervention could result in changes in physicians' practice behavior. Methods. Twenty rheumatologists performed a prospective chart audit of 50 consecutive patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and again after 6 months. Ten were randomized to the educational intervention: monthly Web-based conferences on the value of systematic assessments in RA, recent evidence-based information, practice efficiency, and other topics; this group also read articles on targeting care in RA. The others were randomized to no intervention. Results. One thousand serial RA charts were audited at baseline and 1000 at 6 months, with no between-group differences in patient characteristics: mean disease duration of 10 years; 77% women; 74% rheumatoid factor- positive; mean Disease Activity Score (DAS) 3.7; and 68% taking methotrexate, 14% taking steroids, and 27% taking biologics. At 6 months the intervention group collected more global assessments (patient global 53% preintervention vs 66% postintervention, and MD global 51% vs 60%; p < 0.05) and Health Assessment Questionnaires (37% vs 42%; p > 0.05; p = nonsignificant), whereas controls had no change in outcomes collected. For the intervention group there was a 32% increase in calculable composite scores [such as DAS, Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), Clinical Disease Activity Index; p < 0.05] but no change in the controls. There was more targeting to a low disease state. For those with SDAI between 3.3 and 11, the percentage of patients receiving a change in therapy was 66% in the intervention group and 36% in controls (p < 0.05). When DAS was between 2.4 and 3.6, 57% of the intervention group and 38% of controls made changes to treatment (p < 0.05). Conclusion. Small-group learning with feedback from practice audits is an inexpensive way to improve outcomes in RA. The Journal of Rheumatology Copyright © 2012. All rights reserved.

References Powered by Scopus

Modified disease activity scores that include twenty‐eight‐joint counts development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis

5534Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis

4147Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Changing physician performance: A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies

2430Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Evidence for treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: Results of a systematic literature search update

216Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Physician adherence to treat-to-target and practice guidelines in rheumatoid arthritis

24Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Randomised study versus control group of customised therapeutic education for patients in follow-up for rheumatoid arthritis

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pope, J., Thorne, C., Cividino, A., & Lucas, K. (2012). Effect of rheumatologist education on systematic measurements and treatment decisions in rheumatoid arthritis: The metrix study. Journal of Rheumatology, 39(12), 2247–2252. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.120597

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 24

57%

Researcher 12

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 30

68%

Nursing and Health Professions 6

14%

Computer Science 4

9%

Psychology 4

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free