Effect of rheumatologist education on systematic measurements and treatment decisions in rheumatoid arthritis: The metrix study

10Citations
Citations of this article
78Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective. To determine whether an educational intervention could result in changes in physicians' practice behavior. Methods. Twenty rheumatologists performed a prospective chart audit of 50 consecutive patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and again after 6 months. Ten were randomized to the educational intervention: monthly Web-based conferences on the value of systematic assessments in RA, recent evidence-based information, practice efficiency, and other topics; this group also read articles on targeting care in RA. The others were randomized to no intervention. Results. One thousand serial RA charts were audited at baseline and 1000 at 6 months, with no between-group differences in patient characteristics: mean disease duration of 10 years; 77% women; 74% rheumatoid factor- positive; mean Disease Activity Score (DAS) 3.7; and 68% taking methotrexate, 14% taking steroids, and 27% taking biologics. At 6 months the intervention group collected more global assessments (patient global 53% preintervention vs 66% postintervention, and MD global 51% vs 60%; p < 0.05) and Health Assessment Questionnaires (37% vs 42%; p > 0.05; p = nonsignificant), whereas controls had no change in outcomes collected. For the intervention group there was a 32% increase in calculable composite scores [such as DAS, Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), Clinical Disease Activity Index; p < 0.05] but no change in the controls. There was more targeting to a low disease state. For those with SDAI between 3.3 and 11, the percentage of patients receiving a change in therapy was 66% in the intervention group and 36% in controls (p < 0.05). When DAS was between 2.4 and 3.6, 57% of the intervention group and 38% of controls made changes to treatment (p < 0.05). Conclusion. Small-group learning with feedback from practice audits is an inexpensive way to improve outcomes in RA. The Journal of Rheumatology Copyright © 2012. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pope, J., Thorne, C., Cividino, A., & Lucas, K. (2012). Effect of rheumatologist education on systematic measurements and treatment decisions in rheumatoid arthritis: The metrix study. Journal of Rheumatology, 39(12), 2247–2252. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.120597

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free