Perspectives of clinical genetics professionals toward genome sequencing and incidental findings: A survey study

66Citations
Citations of this article
74Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The introduction of clinical genome-wide sequencing raises complex issues regarding the management of incidental findings. However, there is a lack of empirical studies assessing views of providers involved in potential disclosure of such findings. In an anonymous survey of 279 clinical genetics professionals, we found that the vast majority of participants agreed that they were interested in knowing about clinically actionable incidental findings in themselves (96%) and their child (99%), and they reported that these types of findings should be disclosed in adult (96%) and minor (98%) patients. Approximately three-fourths agreed that they were personally interested in knowing about an adult-onset clinically actionable disease (78%) and a childhood-onset non-clinically actionable disease (75%) in their child. A similar percentage of participants (70%) felt that these two types of findings should be disclosed to patients. Forty-four percent of participants wanted to know about an incidental finding that indicates an adult-onset non-clinically actionable condition in themselves and 31% wanted to know about this type of information in their child. Findings from this study revealed participants' views highly dependent on clinical actionability. Further research is needed with a broader population of geneticists to increase generalizability, and with diverse patients to assess their perspectives about results disclosure from clinical sequencing. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

References Powered by Scopus

609Citations
374Readers
Get full text
Get full text

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lemke, A., Bick, D., Dimmock, D., Simpson, P., & Veith, R. (2013). Perspectives of clinical genetics professionals toward genome sequencing and incidental findings: A survey study. Clinical Genetics, 84(3), 230–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/cge.12060

Readers over time

‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 27

56%

Researcher 11

23%

Professor / Associate Prof. 9

19%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 22

41%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20

37%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 7

13%

Social Sciences 5

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0