Disparate PM2.5 metrics from measurement and modelling: Implications for assessing PM2.5 regulatory compliance

2Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A study has been done to investigate the difference in the modelled bound water component of PM2.5 air mass concentration when modelled to correspond to different measurement methods. The study found that the June average PM2.5 air mass concentration along a transect through southern England for a 2020 emissions scenario differed by 89 % when modelled corresponding to the two different measurement methods. It is, therefore, clear from this study that careful consideration needs to be taken to ensure that the modelled PM2.5 air mass concentration corresponds to the appropriate measurement method.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sutton, J. P. (2016). Disparate PM2.5 metrics from measurement and modelling: Implications for assessing PM2.5 regulatory compliance. In Springer Proceedings in Complexity (pp. 543–546). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24478-5_87

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free