Conceptualizing Landscapes: A comparative study of landscape categories with Navajo and english-speaking participants

3Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Understanding human concepts, spatial and other, is not only one of the most prominent topics in the cognitive and spatial sciences; it is also one of the most challenging. While it is possible to focus on specific aspects of our spatial environment and abstract away complexities for experimental purposes, it is important to understand how cognition in the wild or at least with complex stimuli works, too. The research presented in this paper addresses emerging topics in the area of landscape conceptualization and explicitly uses a diversity fostering approach to uncover potentials, challenges, complexities, and patterns in human landscape concepts. Based on a representation of different landscapes (images) responses from two different populations were elicited: Navajo and the (US) crowd. Our data provides support for the idea of conceptual pluralism; we can confirm that participant responses are far from random and that, also diverse, patterns exist that allow for advancing our understanding of human spatial cognition with complex stimuli.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Klippe, A., Mark, D., Wallgrün, J. O., & Stea, D. (2015). Conceptualizing Landscapes: A comparative study of landscape categories with Navajo and english-speaking participants. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 9368, pp. 268–288). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23374-1_13

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free