Real-time gating of IVUS sequences based on motion blur analysis: Method and quantitative validation

24Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) is an image-guiding technique for cardiovascular diagnostic, providing cross-sectional images of vessels. During the acquisition, the catheter is pulled back (pullback) at a constant speed in order to acquire spatially subsequent images of the artery. However, during this procedure, the heart twist produces a swinging fluctuation of the probe position along the vessel axis. In this paper we propose a real-time gating algorithm based on the analysis of motion blur variations during the IVUS sequence. Quantitative tests performed on an in-vitro ground truth data base shown that our method is superior to state of the art algorithms both in computational speed and accuracy. © 2010 Springer-Verlag.

References Powered by Scopus

Motion from blur

178Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Identification of Blur Parameters from Motion Blurred Images

170Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

ECG-gated versus nongated three-dimensional intracoronary ultrasound analysis: Implications for volumetric measurements

96Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Standardized evaluation methodology and reference database for evaluating IVUS image segmentation

129Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Automatic bifurcation detection in coronary IVUS sequences

31Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Improving Cardiac Phase Extraction in IVUS Studies by Integration of Gating Methods

24Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gatta, C., Balocco, S., Ciompi, F., Hemetsberger, R., Leor, O. R., & Radeva, P. (2010). Real-time gating of IVUS sequences based on motion blur analysis: Method and quantitative validation. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 6362 LNCS, pp. 59–67). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15745-5_8

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 19

61%

Researcher 6

19%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 14

56%

Engineering 6

24%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

12%

Mathematics 2

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free