Standardization of Methodology of Light-to-Heat Conversion Efficiency Determination for Colloidal Nanoheaters

44Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Localized photothermal therapy (PTT) has been demonstrated to be a promising method of combating cancer, that additionally synergistically enhances other treatment modalities such as photodynamic therapy or chemotherapy. PTT exploits nanoparticles (called nanoheaters), that upon proper biofunctionalization may target cancerous tissues, and under light stimulation may convert the energy of photons to heat, leading to local overheating and treatment of cancerous cells. Despite extensive work, there is, however, no agreement on how to accurately and quantitatively compare light-to-heat conversion efficiency (ηQ) and rank the nanoheating performances of various groups of nanomaterials. This disagreement is highly problematic because the obtained ηQvalues, measured with various methods, differ significantly for similar nanomaterials. In this work, we experimentally review existing optical setups, methods, and physical models used to evaluate ηQ. In order to draw a binding conclusion, we cross-check and critically evaluate the same Au@SiO2sample in various experimental conditions. This critical study let us additionally compare and understand the influence of the other experimental factors, such as stirring, data recording and analysis, and assumptions on the effective mass of the system, in order to determine ηQin a most straightforward and reproducible way. Our goal is therefore to contribute to the understanding, standardization, and reliable evaluation of ηQmeasurements, aiming to accurately rank various nanoheater platforms.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Paściak, A., Pilch-Wróbel, A., Marciniak, Ł., Schuck, P. J., & Bednarkiewicz, A. (2021). Standardization of Methodology of Light-to-Heat Conversion Efficiency Determination for Colloidal Nanoheaters. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces, 13(37), 44556–44567. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c12409

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free