Do-gooder derogation in children: the social costs of generosity

18Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Generosity is greatly valued and admired, but can it sometimes be unappealing? The current study investigated 8- to 10-year-old children’s (N = 128) preference for generous individuals, and the effects of social comparison on their preferences. In Experiment 1, children showed a strong preference for a generous to a stingy child; however, this preference was significantly reduced in a situation that afforded children a comparison of their own (lesser) generosity to that of another child. In Experiment 2, children’s liking for a generous individual was not reduced when that individual was an adult, suggesting that similarity in age influences whether a child engages in social comparison. These findings indicate that, by middle childhood, coming up short in comparison with a peer can decrease one’s liking for a generous individual.

References Powered by Scopus

A Theory of Social Comparison Processes

13220Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The NimStim set of facial expressions: Judgments from untrained research participants

2747Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Theory and Research Concerning Social Comparisons of Personal Attributes

1359Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The influence of reputational concerns on children's prosociality

102Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Children use partial resource sharing as a cue to friendship

49Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Not Noble Savages After All: Limits to Early Altruism

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tasimi, A., Dominguez, A., & Wynn, K. (2015). Do-gooder derogation in children: the social costs of generosity. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01036

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 26

65%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

18%

Researcher 5

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 22

63%

Social Sciences 7

20%

Business, Management and Accounting 4

11%

Philosophy 2

6%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
References: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 20

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free