Comparison of intra-luminal versus intra-tumoural temperature measurements in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer treated with the coaxial TEM system: Report of a feasibility study

21Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A study was performed on regional hyperthermia for patients with locally advanced prostate carcinoma. The primary objective was to analyse the thermometry data with an emphasis on the possibility of replacing invasive thermometry by tumour-related intra-luminal thermometry. Fourteen patients were treated with a combination of conformal external beam radiotherapy (70 Gy) and hyperthermia. Hyperthermia was delivered using the Coaxial TEM system, one treatment per week, to a total of five treatments. Thermometry was performed in bladder, urethra, rectum and esophagus. Invasive thermometry in the prostate was carried out during one or two treatments for each patient by placing transperineally a central and a peripheral catheter. Heterogeneous temperature distributions were measured in the prostate. The mean average invasive temperature range was 1.1°C. Due to the temperature heterogeneity and a limited number of thermometry sensors (mean 7, range 2-13), large variability between treatments and patients existed regarding achieved temperatures and dose. The mean invasive T90 was 40.2±0.6°C and T50 was 40.8±0.6°C. The mean Cummin 790>40.5°C per treatment was 22 (range 0-50). Importantly, intra-luminal temperatures did not reliably predict invasively measured temperatures. Invasive thermometry, therefore, remains compulsory to calculate a thermal dose for an individual patient. Changes in temperature during treatment, measured by the urethral sensors, corresponded well with changes in temperature measured by the individual invasive sensors. Similar comparison of rectal temperature changes with intra-prostatic temperature changes was not as predictive. The similarity in temperature changes between the urethral and interstial sites, suggests that urethral temperatures are sufficient for treatment optimization. The SAR profile did not correspond with the temperature profile indicating heterogeneous perfusion. Although regional hyperthermia in combination with external beam radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate carcinoma is clinically feasible, the question on the importance of invasive thermometry remains.

References Powered by Scopus

Thermal dose determination in cancer therapy

2149Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Comparison of microscopic vascularity in benign and malignant prostate tissue

292Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Sensitivity of hyperthermia trial outcomes to temperature and time: Implications for thermal goals of treatment

249Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Clinical hyperthermia of prostate cancer using magnetic nanoparticles: Presentation of a new interstitial technique

719Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Thermotherapy of Prostate Cancer Using Magnetic Nanoparticles: Feasibility, Imaging, and Three-Dimensional Temperature Distribution

478Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Thermal therapy, Part 2: Hyperthermia techniques

211Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Vulpen, M., De Leeuw, A. A. C., Van De Kamer, J. B., Kroeze, H., Boon, T. A., Wárlám-Rodenhuis, C. C., … Battermann, J. J. (2003). Comparison of intra-luminal versus intra-tumoural temperature measurements in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer treated with the coaxial TEM system: Report of a feasibility study. International Journal of Hyperthermia, 19(5), 481–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/0265673031000096327

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

63%

Researcher 3

19%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 12

63%

Engineering 4

21%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 2

11%

Computer Science 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free