Conservative cutoff placement in a numerical decision task

  • HOSHINO Y
0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Conducted 2 experiments with 40 university students who were required to make binary decisions on 5-digit numbers drawn from 2 overlapping normal distributions. In Exp I, there were 2 conditions of discriminability determined by the degree of the overlap of distributions. Although observed cutoff locations for uneven prior probabilities of stimulus distributions were conservative in both conditions, the Ss in the low discriminative condition changed their cutoff placement less than those in the high discriminative condition. In both conditions, Ss' response probabilities were close to the prior probabilities. In Exp II, the verbal protocol during the task showed that ambiguous impressions were used for judgments and that responses were made as accurately as possible to both stimulus distributions. It is concluded that the heuristics used by Ss in the task could account for the conservative cutoff placement and that the heuristics confirmed their judgments. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)

References Powered by Scopus

Verbal reports as data

2995Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A theory of criterion setting with an application to sequential dependencies

239Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Signal-detectability theory of recognition-memory performance

110Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

HOSHINO, Y. (1986). Conservative cutoff placement in a numerical decision task. Japanese Psychological Research, 28(2), 94–103. https://doi.org/10.4992/psycholres1954.28.94

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘20‘2100.250.50.751

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

25%

Researcher 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 3

60%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

20%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0