One-year recovery rates for young people with depression and/or anxiety not receiving treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

3Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives To systematically review 1-year recovery rates for young people experiencing depression and/or anxiety who are not receiving any specific mental health treatment. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science and Global Health were searched for articles published from 1980 through to August 2022. Eligibility criteria Articles were peer-reviewed, published in English and had baseline and 1-year follow-up depression and/or anxiety outcomes for young people aged 10-24 years without specific treatment. Data extraction and synthesis Three reviewers extracted relevant data. Meta-analysis was conducted to calculate the proportion of individuals classified as recovered after 1 year. The quality of evidence was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results Of the 17 250 references screened for inclusion, five articles with 1011 participants in total were included. Studies reported a 1-year recovery rate of between 47% and 64%. In the meta-analysis, the overall pooled proportion of recovered young people is 0.54 (0.45 to 0.63). Conclusions The findings suggest that after 1 year about 54% of young people with symptoms of anxiety and/or depression recover without any specific mental health treatment. Future research should identify individual characteristics predicting recovery and explore resources and activities which may help young people recover from depression and/or anxiety. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021251556.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Roach, A., Stanislaus Sureshkumar, D., Elliot, K., Hidalgo-Padilla, L., Van Loggerenberg, F., Hounsell, L., … Priebe, S. (2023). One-year recovery rates for young people with depression and/or anxiety not receiving treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open, 13(7). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072093

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free