Anakinra for palmoplantar pustulosis: results from a randomized, double-blind, multicentre, two-staged, adaptive placebo-controlled trial (APRICOT)*

21Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) is a rare, debilitating, chronic inflammatory skin disease that affects the hands and feet. Clinical, immunological and genetic findings suggest a pathogenic role for interleukin (IL)-1. Objectives: To determine whether anakinra (an IL-1 receptor antagonist) delivers therapeutic benefit in PPP. Methods: This was a randomized (1 : 1), double-blind, two-staged, adaptive, UK multicentre, placebo-controlled trial [ISCRTN13127147 (registered 1 August 2016); EudraCT number: 2015-003600-23 (registered 1 April 2016)]. Participants had a diagnosis of PPP (> 6 months) requiring systemic therapy. Treatment was 8 weeks of anakinra or placebo via daily, self-administered subcutaneous injections. Primary outcome was the Palmoplantar Pustulosis Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PPPASI) at 8 weeks. Results: A total of 374 patients were screened; 64 were enrolled (31 in the anakinra arm and 33 in the placebo arm) with a mean (SD) baseline PPPASI of 17·8 (10·5) and a PPP investigator’s global assessment of severe (50%) or moderate (50%). The baseline adjusted mean difference in PPPASI favoured anakinra but did not demonstrate superiority in the intention-to-treat analysis [–1·65, 95% confidence interval (CI) –4·77 to 1·47; P = 0·30]. Similarly, secondary objective measures, including fresh pustule count (2·94, 95% CI –26·44 to 32·33; favouring anakinra), total pustule count (–30·08, 95% CI –83·20 to 23·05; favouring placebo) and patient-reported outcomes, did not show superiority of anakinra. When modelling the impact of adherence, the PPPASI complier average causal effect for an individual who received ≥ 90% of the total treatment (48% in the anakinra group) was –3·80 (95% CI –10·76 to 3·16; P = 0·285). No serious adverse events occurred. Conclusions: No evidence for the superiority of anakinra was found. IL-1 blockade is not a useful intervention for the treatment of PPP.

References Powered by Scopus

An autoinflammatory disease with deficiency of the interleukin-1-receptor antagonist

832Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

European consensus statement on phenotypes of pustular psoriasis

338Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Inhibition of the interleukin-36 pathway for the treatment of generalized pustular psoriasis

238Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

IL-1 Family Cytokines in Inflammatory Dermatoses: Pathogenetic Role and Potential Therapeutic Implications

41Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Single-cell analysis implicates T<inf>H</inf>17-to-T<inf>H</inf>2 cell plasticity in the pathogenesis of palmoplantar pustulosis

35Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Eliminating Ambiguous Treatment Effects Using Estimands

23Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cro, S., Cornelius, V. R., Pink, A. E., Wilson, R., Pushpa-Rajah, A., Patel, P., … Cooper, H. (2022). Anakinra for palmoplantar pustulosis: results from a randomized, double-blind, multicentre, two-staged, adaptive placebo-controlled trial (APRICOT)*. British Journal of Dermatology, 186(2), 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.20653

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 2

40%

Chemical Engineering 1

20%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 1

20%

Social Sciences 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0