Optimal approximate quantum error correction for quantum metrology

30Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

For a generic set of Markovian noise models, the estimation precision of a parameter associated with the Hamiltonian is limited by the 1/t scaling, where t is the total probing time, in which case the maximal possible quantum improvement in the asymptotic limit of large t is restricted to a constant factor. However, situations arise where the constant factor improvement could be significant, yet no effective quantum strategies are known. Here we propose an optimal approximate quantum error correction (AQEC) strategy asymptotically saturating the precision lower bound in the most general adaptive parameter estimation scheme, where arbitrary and frequent quantum controls are allowed. We also provide an efficient numerical algorithm finding the optimal code. Finally, we consider highly biased noise and show that using the optimal AQEC strategy, strong noises are fully corrected, while the estimation precision depends only on the strength of weak noises in the limiting case.

References Powered by Scopus

The Theory of Open Quantum Systems

9031Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups

5786Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Completely positive dynamical semigroups of N-level systems

3088Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Mitiq: A software package for error mitigation on noisy quantum computers

60Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Optimal Scheme for Quantum Metrology

55Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mid-Circuit Cavity Measurement in a Neutral Atom Array

52Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhou, S., & Jiang, L. (2020). Optimal approximate quantum error correction for quantum metrology. Physical Review Research, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.013235

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

74%

Researcher 3

16%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Physics and Astronomy 17

77%

Computer Science 3

14%

Mathematics 1

5%

Engineering 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free