In recent years, additive manufacturing has become a regular process in various industries, and consequently there is an increasing need to evaluate the environmental aspects of this technology and its associated materials. In this paper, comparative cradle-to-grave life cycle assessments between a conventional product and a 3D-printed alternative made of polylactic acid (PLA) and PLA-wood material were investigated based on the standard ISO 14044:2006. The environmental impact of each product was quantified for 18 categories. The goal of life cycle assessment (LCA) was to determine whether the use of 3D printed PLA/PLA-wood products can be a sustainable alternative to traditional metal products. The paper presents a case study in which a comparative LCA was conducted. The results show that a metal part manufactured using conventional subtractive processes (milling, drilling, welding, etc.) has a higher environmental impact compared to 3D-printed alternatives made from renewable materials. However, there are many sub-issues that need to be adequately addressed.
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
CITATION STYLE
Krapež Tomec, D., Oblak, L., Kitek Kuzman, M., Glavonjić, B., & Bizjak Govedič, T. (2024). Environmental Assessment/Evaluation of 3D Printing and 3D Printing with Wood-PLA Composites - Case Study. Drvna Industrija, 75(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.5552/drvind.2024.0107