Infliximab, methotrexate and their combination for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

7Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We performed a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of infliximab + methotrexate (IFX + MTX) regimens versus MTX alone or in combination with other disease- -modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). We searched through major databases, the grey literature and did a manual search. Two independent reviewers conducted the selection, data extraction and analysis of the quality of the studies. Meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager® 5.1 software. Nine trials were included. The mean modified Jadad score was 4.4, but only one study showed low risk of bias. IFX + MTX regimen pre- sented better responses in clinical outcomes of ACR and DAS28 by up to 54 weeks, and of radiographic progression by up to 104 weeks. Withdrawals due to lack of efficacy was lower in the IFX + MTX group. No significant difference in adverse events was observed. The IFX + MTX combination is more effective than treatment with MTX alone or DMARDs combination. This regimen presented good tolerability in patients previously treated with DMARDs, not treated with MTX or with insufficient responses to MTX. The efficacy of IFX + MTX is noted primarily during initial periods of treatment. High doses of IFX were as effective as the standard dose, but with possible higher risk of serious infections. Therefore, we advise clinicians to use the standard dose of IFX 3 mg/kg every 8 weeks.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Oliveira Costa, J., de Lemos, L. L. P., de Ávila Machado, M. A., Almeida, A. M., Kakehasi, A. M., de Eloísa Araújo, V., … de Assis Acurcio, F. (2015). Infliximab, methotrexate and their combination for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia. Elsevier Editora Ltda. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbr.2014.10.009

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free