What a classical r-matrix really is

143Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

To my friend and colleague K.C. Reddy on occasion of his retirement. The notion of classical r-matrix is re-examined, and a definition suitable to differential (-difference) Lie algebras,–where the standard definitions are shown to be deficient,–is proposed, the notion of an O-operator. This notion has all the natural properties one would expect form it, but lacks those which are artifacts of finite-dimensional isomorpisms such as not true in differential generality relation End (V) V ∗ ⊗ V for a vector space V. Examples considered include a quadratic Poisson bracket on the dual space to a Lie algebra; generalized symplectic-quadratic models of such brackets (aka Clebsch representations); and Drinfel’d’s 2-cocycle interpretation of nondegenate classical r-matrices. © 1999 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kupershmidt, B. A. (1999). What a classical r-matrix really is. Journal of Nonlinear Mathematical Physics, 6(4), 448–488. https://doi.org/10.2991/jnmp.1999.6.4.5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free