Progress in clinical neurosciences: A systematic review of the use of triptans in acute migraine

49Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: A systematic review of the literature was undertaken, to consolidate evidence concerning the efficacy and safety of triptans currently available in Canada (sumatriptan, rizatriptan, naratriptan, zolmitriptan), and to provide guidelines for selection of a triptan. Methods: Data from published, randomized, placebo-controlled trials were pooled and a combined number needed to treat (NNT) and number needed to harm (NNH) was generated for each triptan. Direct comparative trials of triptans were also examined. Results: The lowest NNT for headache response/pain-free at one/two hours is observed with subcutaneous sumatriptan. Among the oral formulations, the lowest NNT is observed with rizatriptan and the highest NNT with naratriptan. The lowest NNH is observed with subcutaneous sumatriptan. Conclusions: Triptans are relatively safe and effective medications for acute migraine attacks. However, differences among them are relatively small. Considerations in selecting a triptan include individual patient response/tolerance, characteristics of the attacks, relief of associated symptoms, consistency of response, headache recurrence, delivery systems and patient preference.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gawel, M. J., Worthington, I., & Maggisano, A. (2001). Progress in clinical neurosciences: A systematic review of the use of triptans in acute migraine. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0317167100052525

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free