ACCURACY of UNSUPERVISED CLASSIFICATION to DETERMINE CORAL HEALTH USING SPOT-6 and SENTINEL-2A

7Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Characteristics of corals spectral from different species are expected to have optically different characters. The aims of this research are to compare unsupervised classification between IsoData and K-Means methods with Lyzenga application, and to analyze the precision of SPOT-6 and Sentinel-2A satellite imagery in classsifying shallow water habitat. The image processing are atmosferic correction, cropping, masking, Depth Invariant Index, Unsupervised classification, ground truthing, reclassify, accuracy assessment, and shallow water habitat spectral reflectance analysis. Rubble and dead coral with algae were indicating as coral death due to either damaging human activity or natural death such as bleaching. The accuracy of unsupervised classification IsoData and K-Means method have the same accuracy 62.50%. The IsoData method is better detected live coral and algae. Rubble were dominant detected in K-Means method.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nurdin, N., Supriadi, S., Lanuru, M., Akbar As, M., Kartika, I., & Komatsu, T. (2019). ACCURACY of UNSUPERVISED CLASSIFICATION to DETERMINE CORAL HEALTH USING SPOT-6 and SENTINEL-2A. In International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives (Vol. 42, pp. 503–509). International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W16-503-2019

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free