Reproducibility assessment of metabolic variables characterizing muscle energetics in vivo: A31P-MRS study

64Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to assess the reliability of metabolic parameters measured using 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy ( 31P MRS) during two standardized rest-exercise-recovery protocols. Twelve healthy subjects performed the standardized protocols at two different intensities; i.e., a moderate intensity (MOD) repeated over a two-month period and heavy intensity (HEAVY) repeated over a year's time. Test-retest reliability was analyzed using coefficient of variation (CV), limits of agreement (LOA), and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). During exercise and recovery periods, most of the metabolic parameters exhibited a good reliability. The CVs of individual concentration of phosphocreatine ([PCr]), concentration of adenosine diphosphate ([ADP]), and pH values recorded at end of the HEAVY exercise were lower than 15%. The CV calculated for the rate of PCr resynthesis and the maximal oxidative capacity were less than 13% during the HEAVY protocol. Inferred parameters such as oxidative and total adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production rates exhibited a good reliability (ICC ≈ 0.7; CV < 15% during the HEAVY protocol). Our results demonstrated that measurement error using 31P-MRS during a standardized exercise was low and that biological variability accounted for the vast majority of the measurement variability. In addition, the corresponding metabolic measurements can reliably be used for longitudinal studies performed even over a long period of time. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Layec, G., Bringard, A., Le Fur, Y., Vilmen, C., Micallef, J. P., Perrey, S., … Bendahan, D. (2009). Reproducibility assessment of metabolic variables characterizing muscle energetics in vivo: A31P-MRS study. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 62(4), 840–854. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.22085

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free