Data quality at the Icelandic Cancer Registry: Comparability, validity, timeliness and completeness

131Citations
Citations of this article
90Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction. The nationwide Icelandic Cancer Registry (ICR) was established in 1954 and has been extensively used for research from the outset although formal quality assessment of the registry database has not previously been undertaken. In this paper we report the first formal evaluation of the comparability, validity, timeliness and completeness of the ICR. Material and methods. Data from the ICR for the period 19552009 (41 994 cancer diagnoses) were used, applying established quantitative and semi-quantitative methods. In order to evaluate the completeness of the ICR, record linkage was performed between the ICR and the population-based Hospital Discharge Registry to identify potential missing cases for tumour diagnoses in 2000 and 2001. Results. The registration is in accordance with internationally accepted standards. It has high validity, but random variation in rates is prominent in this small population. Record linkage with the Hospital Discharge Registry revealed that in addition to the 2459 cancers registered in 20002001, 21 cases were missing, indicating 99.15% completeness. Tumours of the central nervous system constituted 71%, and haematological malignancies 19% of these missing entries. Discussion. The ICR has high completeness, validity and timeliness and is comparable to the cancer registries of the other Nordic Countries. As cancer registries have many important roles, it is of great importance that their data are at all times as complete and valid as possible. Thus the ICR aims to constantly improve and update the data gathering process. © 2012 Informa Healthcare.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sigurdardottir, L. G., Jonasson, J. G., Stefansdottir, S., Jonsdottir, A., Olafsdottir, G. H., Olafsdottir, E. J., & Tryggvadottir, L. (2012). Data quality at the Icelandic Cancer Registry: Comparability, validity, timeliness and completeness. Acta Oncologica, 51(7), 880–889. https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2012.698751

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free