Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of an Arabic language version of the brief illness perception questionnaire in Lebanon

18Citations
Citations of this article
72Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Patients’ positive illness perceptions (IPs) significantly contribute to treatment success. The Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (Brief IPQ) is widely used in various diseases for assessing IPs. It was developed in English-speaking countries and studies on it in Arab countries are scarce. Objectives, Setting and design: This observational cross-sectional study aimed to cross-culturally adapt the Brief IPQ English version into a modern Arabic language version and determine its psychometric properties in a sample of Lebanese cardiac disease patients. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Lebanon. Participants: A convenience sample of 30 patients with cardiac disease were recruited during routine visits to cardiologists’ offices in Beirut, Lebanon. Inclusion criteria were at least one cardiac disease for at least 6 months with no acute episode or exacerbation of the disease during the 6 preceding months, age≥18 years, and the ability to read and comprehend Arabic. The pre-final version of the Brief IPQ Arabic version was tested for face and content validity. The meaning, comprehensibility, and acceptability were studied by individual interviews. For discriminant validity and internal consistency of the Brief IPQ Arabic version (Brief IPQ-Ar), 100 patients were recruited in a similar manner using the same inclusion criteria. To assess reproducibility, 30 patients, selected randomly from the 100 patients, filled the questionnaire a second time, 3–4 weeks after its first administration and under the same conditions. Main outcome measures: Psychometric properties of the Brief IPQ-Ar among Lebanese patients suffering from cardiac diseases. Results: Semantic equivalence between the Brief IPQ-Ar questions and patients’ descriptions was 100%. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.717, which shows good internal consistency. Reproducibility was satisfactory (ICC values>0.776). Moreover, the Brief IPQ-Ar discriminated participants according to the type of cardiac disease and treatment-related characteristics. Conclusions: We confirm that the Brief IPQ-Ar is appropriate for exploring IPs in cardiac disease patients whose first language is Arabic. Further research should be conducted to test this Arabic version in other types of diseases.

References Powered by Scopus

Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

11283Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

9658Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures

9271Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Illness perceptions, HbA1c, and adherence in type 2 diabetes in Saudi Arabia

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The association of illness perceptions and God locus of health control with self-care behaviours in patients with type 2 diabetes in Saudi Arabia

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Validation of questionnaire on the Spiritual Needs Assessment for Patients (SNAP) questionnaire in Brazilian Portuguese

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Saarti, S., Jabbour, H., El Osta, N., Hajj, A., & Khabbaz, L. R. (2016). Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of an Arabic language version of the brief illness perception questionnaire in Lebanon. Libyan Journal of Medicine, 11. https://doi.org/10.3402/ljm.v11.31976

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 22

59%

Researcher 6

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

14%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 16

41%

Medicine and Dentistry 10

26%

Psychology 10

26%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 3

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 19

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free