We developed a 65 type 2 diabetes (T2D) variant-weighted gene score to examine the impact on T2D risk assessment in a U.K.-based consortium of prospective studies, with subjects initially free from T2D (N = 13,294; 37.3% women; mean age 58.5 [38-99] years). We compared the performance of the gene score with the phenotypically derived Framingham Offspring Study T2D risk model and then the two in combination. Over the median 10 years of followup, 804 participants developed T2D. The odds ratio for T2D (top vs. bottom quintiles of gene score) was 2.70 (95% CI 2.12-3.43). With a 10% false-positive rate, the genetic score alone detected 19.9% incident cases, the Framingham risk model 30.7%, and together 37.3%. The respective area under the receiver operator characteristic curves were 0.60 (95% CI 0.58-0.62), 0.75 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.77), and 0.76 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.78). The combined risk score net reclassification improvement (NRI) was 8.1% (5.0 to 11.2; P = 3.31 3 10-7). While BMI stratification into tertiles influenced the NRI (BMI £24.5 kg/m2, 27.6% [95% CI 17.7-37.5], P = 4.82 3 10-8; 24.5-27.5 kg/m2, 11.6% [95% CI 5.8-17.4], P = 9.88 3 10-5; >27.5 kg/m2, 2.6% [95% CI 21.4 to 6.6], P = 0.20), age categories did not. The addition of the gene score to a phenotypic risk model leads to a potentially clinically important improvement in discrimination of incident T2D.
CITATION STYLE
Talmud, P. J., Cooper, J. A., Morris, R. W., Dudbridge, F., Shah, T., Engmann, J., … Humphries, S. E. (2015). Sixty-five common genetic variants and prediction of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes, 64(5), 1830–1840. https://doi.org/10.2337/db14-1504
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.