Exercise-training-induced changes in metabolic capacity with age: The role of central cardiovascular plasticity

43Citations
Citations of this article
93Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Although aging is typically associated with a decline in maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max), young and old subjects, of similar initial muscle metabolic capacity, increased quadriceps VO2max equally when this small muscle mass was trained in isolation. As it is unclear if this preserved exercise-induced plasticity with age is still evident with centrally challenging whole body exercise, we assessed maximal exercise responses in 13 young (24∈±∈2 years) and 13 old (60∈±∈3 years) males, matched for cycling VO2max (3.82∈±∈0.66 and 3.69∈±∈0.30 L min-1, respectively), both before and after 8 weeks of high aerobic intensity cycle exercise training. As a consequence of the training both young and old significantly improved VO 2max (13∈±∈6 vs. 6∈±∈7 %) and maximal power output (20∈±∈6 vs. 10∈±∈6 %, respectively) from baseline, however, the young exhibited a significantly larger increase than the old. Similarly, independently assessed maximal cardiac output (Q max) tended to increase more in the young (16∈±∈ 14 %) than in the old (11∈±∈12 %), with no change in a-vO 2 difference in either group. Further examination of the components of Q max provided additional evidence of reduced exercise-induced plasticity in both maximal heart rate (young -3 %, old 0 %) and stroke volume (young 19∈±∈15, old 11∈±∈11 %) in the old. In combination, these findings imply that limited central cardiovascular plasticity may be responsible, at least in part, for the attenuated response to whole body exercise training with increasing age. © 2013 American Aging Association.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, E., Næss, M. S., Hoff, J., Albert, T. L., Pham, Q., Richardson, R. S., & Helgerud, J. (2014). Exercise-training-induced changes in metabolic capacity with age: The role of central cardiovascular plasticity. Age, 36(2), 665–676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-013-9596-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free