Toward whole-of-system action to promote physical activity: A cross-sectoral analysis of physical activity policy in Australia

12Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: The value of a systems thinking approach to tackling population physical inactivity is increasingly recognized. This study used conceptual systems thinking to develop a cognitive map for physical activity (PA) influences and intervention points, which informed a standardized approach to the coding and notation of PA-related policies in Australia. Methods: Policies were identified through desktop searches and input from 33 nominated government representatives attending 2 national PA policy workshops. Documents were audited using predefined criteria spanning policy development, strategic approaches to PA, implementation processes, and evaluation. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: The audit included 110 policies, mainly led by the health or planning/infrastructure sectors (n = 54, 49%). Most policies purporting to promote PA did so as a cobenefit of another objective that was not focused on PA (n = 63, 57%). An intention to monitor progress was indicated in most (n = 94, 85%); however, fewer than half (n = 52, 47%) contained evaluable goals/actions relevant to PA. Descriptions of resourcing/funding arrangements were generally absent or lacked specific commitment (n = 67, 61%). Conclusions: This study describes current PA-relevant policy in Australia and identifies opportunities for improving coordination, implementation, and evaluation to strengthen a whole-of-system and cross-agency approach to increasing population PA.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nau, T., Lee, K., Smith, B. J., Bellew, W., Reece, L., Gelius, P., … Bauman, A. (2019). Toward whole-of-system action to promote physical activity: A cross-sectoral analysis of physical activity policy in Australia. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 16(11), 1029–1038. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2019-0122

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free