Study on Doppler effects estimate in underwater acoustic communication

10Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Two estimate methods of the Doppler effects in mobile underwater acoustic communication have been proposed. For the first method the Doppler coefficients are obtained by estimating frequency change of CW impulse signal with notch filter. For the other method the Doppler coefficients are obtained by estimating chirp rate change of LFM signal with fractional Fourier transform (FRFT). And the performance of the Doppler effects estimation method based on notch filter or the FRFT are compared by the computer simulation. The advantages, shortcoming and the application occasion of the two methods are elaborated. The effectiveness and robustness of the two methods have been proved. © 2013 Acoustical Society of America.

References Powered by Scopus

Computationally efficient Doppler compensation system for underwater acoustic communications

396Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The multiple-parameter discrete fractional Fourier transform

99Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Multiuser underwater acoustic communication using single-element virtual time reversal mirror

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks: A Review of Recent Issues and Challenges

279Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bit-error rate gradient descent Doppler estimation for underwater acoustic OFDM communication

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Double-differential coded M-ary direct sequence spread spectrum for mobile underwater acoustic communication system

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, X., Han, X., Yin, J., & Sheng, X. L. (2013). Study on Doppler effects estimate in underwater acoustic communication. In Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics (Vol. 19). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4799512

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

57%

Researcher 3

43%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 5

56%

Computer Science 2

22%

Physics and Astronomy 1

11%

Linguistics 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free