Context dependence, MOPs, WHIMs and procedures Recanati and Kaplan on cognitive aspects in semantics

1Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

After presenting Kripke’s criticism to Frege’s ideas on context dependence of thoughts, I present two recent attempts of considering cognitive aspects of context dependent expressions inside a truth conditional pragmatics or semantics: Recanati’s non-descriptive modes of presentation (MOPs)and Kaplan’s ways of having in mind (WHIMs). After analysing the two attempts and verifying which answers they should give to the problem discussed by Kripke, I suggest a possible interpretation of these attempts: to insert a procedural or algorithmic level in semantic representations of indexicals. That a function may be computed by different procedures might suggest new possibilities of integrating contextual cognitive aspects in model theoretic semantics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Penco, C. (2015). Context dependence, MOPs, WHIMs and procedures Recanati and Kaplan on cognitive aspects in semantics. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 9405, pp. 410–422). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25591-0_30

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free