Comparative hepatotoxicity of aflatoxin B1 among workers exposed to different organic dust with emphasis on polymorphism role of glutathione S-transferase gene

12Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

AIM: The study aimed to investigate effects of organic dust exposure from different sources on aflatoxin B1-albumin adducts (AFB1/Alb), and role of glutathione S-transferase (GST) gene polymorphism in hepatotoxicity of (AFB1) among exposed workers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Liver enzymes, AFB1/Alb, and GST polymorphism were estimated in 132 wheat flour dust and 87 woods sawmill workers, and 156 controls. RESULTS: Results revealed that AFB1/Alb and liver enzymes were significantly elevated in exposed workers compared to controls, and were significantly higher in sawmill workers compared to flour workers. AFB1/Alb in flour and sawmill workers with GSTT1 and GSTM1&GSTT1 null genotypes were significantly higher than controls, and in sawmill workers with GSTM1&GSTT1 null than flour workers. Liver enzymes (ALT and AST) in sawmill workers were significantly higher than flour workers and controls in all GST polymorphism; except in GSTT1 polymorphism, where these enzymes were significantly higher in the two exposed groups than controls. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, organic dust exposure may cause elevation in AFB1/Alb and liver enzymes of exposed workers, and GST gene polymorphism plays an important role in susceptibility to hepatic parenchymal cell injury; except in workers with GSTT1&GSTM1 null genotype, gene susceptibility seemed to have little role and the main role was for environmental exposures.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Saad-Hussein, A., Shahy, E. M., Shaheen, W., Taha, M. M., Mahdy-Abdallah, H., Ibrahim, K. S., … El-Shamy, K. A. (2016). Comparative hepatotoxicity of aflatoxin B1 among workers exposed to different organic dust with emphasis on polymorphism role of glutathione S-transferase gene. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, 4(2), 312–318. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2016.051

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free