Biomarkers Predictive of Response to Thiopurine Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

13Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The complex nature of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) often results in treatment failure for many patients. With some patients cycling through multiple therapies before achieving a sustained period of remission, the ability to predict a patient's response to therapeutics could decrease the time from active disease to clinical remission and mucosal healing. The prospect of such individualized treatment of IBD would be aided by accurate biomarkers, both fecal and serological, which have to date shown value as indicators of IBD activity. Here we review the utility of generic biomarkers for inflammation or mucosal healing, such as calprotectin, C-reactive protein (CRP), and fecal hemoglobin (fHb) as predictors of response to treatment of IBD. We further provide a deeper insight into the utility of monitoring the thiopurine treatment by thiopurine metabolites or alternative hematologic parameters. In light of multiple recent publications of biomarkers and biological therapy, our focus in this review is predicting response to thiopurine treatment only, that is, Azathioprine and 6-Mercaptopurine.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cornish, J. S., Wirthgen, E., & Däbritz, J. (2020, January 29). Biomarkers Predictive of Response to Thiopurine Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Frontiers in Medicine. Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.00008

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free