Effect of clinician designation on emergency department fast track performance

27Citations
Citations of this article
71Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To examine the effect of clinician designation on emergency department (ED) fast track performance. Design and Setting: A retrospective audit of patients managed in the fast track area of an ED in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia. Participants: Patients triaged to ED fast track from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2008 (n=8714). Main Outcome Measures: Waiting times in relation to Australasian triage scale (ATS) recommendations and ED length of stay (LOS) for non-admitted patients were examined for each clinician group. Results: Compliance with ATS waiting time recommendations was highest (82.5%) for emergency nurse practitioners/candidates and lowest (48.2%) for junior medical officers. Median ED LOS was less than 3 h for non-admitted patients, and 85.8% of non-admitted fast track patients (n=6278) left the ED within 4 h. Patients managed by emergency nurse practitioners/candidates had the shortest ED LOS (median 1.7 h) and patients managed by junior medical officers and locum medical officers the longest ED LOS (median 2.7 h) (χ2=498.539, df=6, p<0.001). Conclusions: Clinician designation does impact on waiting times and, to a lesser extent, ED LOS for patients managed in ED fast track systems. Future research should focus on obtaining a better understanding of the relationship between clinician expertise, time-based performance measures and quality of care indicators.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Considine, J., Kropman, M., & Stergiou, H. E. (2010). Effect of clinician designation on emergency department fast track performance. Emergency Medicine Journal, 27(11), 838–842. https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.2009.083113

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free