Skip to main content
ArticleOPEN ACCESS

It is time to develop appropriate tools for assessing minimal clinically important differences, performance bias and quality of evidence in reviews of behavioral interventions

Addiction
DOI: 10.1111/add.13380
5Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We advocate for the field to define minimal clinically important differences that reflect the perspectives and values of various stakeholders in alcohol intervention research. We also need rigorous risk of bias and quality of evidence assessment tools that are appropriately tailored to behavioral interventions.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Grant, S., Pedersen, E. R., Osilla, K. C., Kulesza, M., & D’Amico, E. J. (2016). It is time to develop appropriate tools for assessing minimal clinically important differences, performance bias and quality of evidence in reviews of behavioral interventions. Addiction. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13380

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free