Development and validation of MIX: Comprehensive free software for meta-analysis of causal research data

430Citations
Citations of this article
195Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Meta-analysis has become a well-known method for synthesis of quantitative data from previously conducted research in applied health sciences. So far, meta-analysis has been particularly useful in evaluating and comparing therapies and in assessing causes of disease. Consequently, the number of software packages that can perform meta-analysis has increased over the years. Unfortunately, it can take a substantial amount of time to get acquainted with some of these programs and most contain little or no interactive educational material. We set out to create and validate an easy-to-use and comprehensive meta-analysis package that would be simple enough programming-wise to remain available as a free download. We specifically aimed at students and researchers who are new to meta-analysis, with important parts of the development oriented towards creating internal interactive tutoring tools and designing features that would facilitate usage of the software as a companion to existing books on meta-analysis. Results: We took an unconventional approach and created a program that uses Excel as a calculation and programming platform. The main programming language was Visual Basic, as implemented in Visual Basic 6 and Visual Basic for Applications in Excel 2000 and higher. The development took approximately two years and resulted in the 'MIX' program, which can be downloaded from the program's website free of charge. Next, we set out to validate the MIX output with two major software packages as reference standards, namely STATA (metan, metabias, and metatrim) and Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version 2. Eight meta-analyses that had been published in major journals were used as data sources. All numerical and graphical results from analyses with MIX were identical to their counterparts in STATA and CMA. The MIX program distinguishes itself from most other programs by the extensive graphical output, the click-and-go (Excel) interface, and the educational features. Conclusion: The MIX program is a valid tool for performing meta-analysis and may be particularly useful in educational environments. © 2006 Bax et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis

10647Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomised trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists Collaboration

1916Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

By how much and how quickly does reduction in serum cholesterol concentration lower risk of ischaemic heart disease?

1118Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2261Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Sleep duration predicts cardiovascular outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies

1605Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Sleep duration and all-cause mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies

1603Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bax, L., Yu, L. M., Ikeda, N., Tsuruta, H., & Moons, K. G. M. (2006). Development and validation of MIX: Comprehensive free software for meta-analysis of causal research data. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-6-50

Readers over time

‘09‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2507142128

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 83

52%

Researcher 40

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 27

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 9

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 48

48%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22

22%

Psychology 17

17%

Nursing and Health Professions 14

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 322

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0