Conclusion: Hegel on Vital Forces, Teleology and Organization

6Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter concludes the book with some considerations of Hegel’s position on Romantic Naturphilosophie. Unlike Kant and Schelling, Hegel did not play an active role in the scientific debate culminating in the emergence of biology as a unified field. However, as an external observer, he was well-positioned to grasp its fundamental philosophical stakes. In particular, he criticized Kant for interpreting teleology solely in terms of intention and the naturphilosophisch movement for its speculative excesses. These critiques, however, establish that Hegel did not consider Naturphilosophie something to be thoroughly rejected, but corrected and integrated. His attempt to facilitate this integration resulted in a theory of biological individuality in which teleology is understood as internal purposiveness, i.e. autonomous self-organization.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gambarotto, A. (2018). Conclusion: Hegel on Vital Forces, Teleology and Organization. In History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences (pp. 115–128). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65415-7_5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free