The entity name identification in classification algorithm: Testing the advocacy coalition framework by document analysis (the case of Russian Civil society policy)

0Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We present a methodology for identification and classification of policy actors. We used network analysis and rule-based named entity recognition on a computational cluster for actor identification, and Chinese whispers algorithm with pre-specified clusters to identify probable coalitions between the identified actors. We test this methodology on the case of Russian policy towards civil society. The theory we have chosen is the Advocacy Coalition Framework, which is a public policy theory aimed at explaining the long-term policy change by understanding how and why people engage in policy-making. One of the key ideas of the theory is that people participate in policy to translate their beliefs into action, and then gather into advocacy coalitions based on the shared “beliefs system.” Identification of actors is one of the most fundamental issues in political science, as it is often the first step in the research process. Another problem of interest is the classification of the actors based on latent characteristics such as shared beliefs. Most of research papers apply qualitative methodology for both of the steps. By applying our methodology, which relies heavily on the quantitative approach, we identify two coalitions – the conformist and the alternative. The leading actors in each coalition correspond with qualitative research in the field.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zaytsev, D., Talovsky, N., Kuskova, V., & Khvatsky, G. (2019). The entity name identification in classification algorithm: Testing the advocacy coalition framework by document analysis (the case of Russian Civil society policy). In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 11832 LNCS, pp. 276–288). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37334-4_25

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free