Prognosis of single spinal metastatic tumors: Predictive value of the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score system for spinal adverse events

16Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Study Design: This was a retrospective cohort study. Purpose: We evaluated the predictive value of the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) system for spinal adverse events (SAEs) in patients with single spinal metastatic tumor. Overview of Literature: The SINS system was developed to assess spinal instability in patients with single metastatic spinal tumor. However, the system's potential predictive value for SAEs has been partially studied. Methods: This system was applied to a retrospective cohort of 78 patients with single spinal metastatic tumors. The patients underwent surgical treatment and were postoperatively followed up for at least 2 years or until death. The attribution of each score and total SINS to SAE (vertebral compression fracture [VCF] and spinal cord compression [SCC]) occurrence was assessed using the Cox proportional hazards model. Results: SAEs occurred on average 7 months after diagnosis of spinal metastasis. The mean survival rate post diagnosis was 43 months. Multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model revealed that the pain (p =0.029) and spinal alignment (p =0.001) scores were significantly related to VCF occurrence, whereas the pain (p =0.008) and posterolateral involvement (p =0.009) scores were related to SCC occurrence. Conclusions: Among the components of the SINS system, while pain and spinal alignment showed a significant association with VCF occurrence, pain and posterolateral involvement showed association with SCC occurrence.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chang, S. Y., Ha, J. H., Seo, S. G., Chang, B. S., Lee, C. K., & Kim, H. (2018). Prognosis of single spinal metastatic tumors: Predictive value of the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score system for spinal adverse events. Asian Spine Journal, 12(5), 919–926. https://doi.org/10.31616/ASJ.2018.12.5.919

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free