Complexity of Steiner tree in split graphs - Dichotomy results

4Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Given a connected graph G and a terminal set R ⊆ V (G), Steiner tree asks for a tree that includes all of R with at most r edges for some integer r ≥ 0. It is known from [ND12,Garey et al. [1]] that Steiner tree is NP-complete in general graphs. Split graph is a graph which can be partitioned into a clique and an independent set. K. White et al. [2] has established that Steiner tree in split graphs is NP-complete. In this paper, we present an interesting dichotomy: we show that Steiner tree on K1,4-free split graphs is polynomial-time solvable, whereas, Steiner tree on K1,5-free split graphs is NP-complete. We investigate K1,4-free and K1,3-free (also known as claw-free) split graphs from a structural perspective. Further, using our structural study, we present polynomialtime algorithms for Steiner tree in K1,4-free and K1,3-free split graphs. Although, polynomial-time solvability of K1,3-free split graphs is implied from K1,4-free split graphs, we wish to highlight our structural observations on K1,3-free split graphs which may be used in other combinatorial problems.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Illuri, M., Renjith, P., & Sadagopan, N. (2016). Complexity of Steiner tree in split graphs - Dichotomy results. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 9602, pp. 308–325). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29221-2_27

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free