Evaluating capacity strengthening for social and behavior change communication: A systematic review

6Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

International social and behavior change communication (SBCC) programs often include capacity strengthening (CS). Quality evaluations of CS can help justify investing in these activities and guide the design of future CS activities. To inform and improve future CS efforts, a comprehensive examination of ways in which activities aimed at strengthening capacity for improved SBCC are assessed is needed. Unfortunately, systematic literature reviews about the assessment of CS activities in SBCC programs are rare. This systematic review helped fill this gap and explored ways in which CS interventions for improved SBCC in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) evaluated their success. A search of electronic research databases yielded a total of 1033 potentially eligible publications. Reviewers identified 19 eligible publications that assessed the effects of activities for improved SBCC capacity. Reviewers identified seven findings, including the fact that evaluating CS for improved SBCC is rare, with only three publications having focused exclusively on evaluating SBCC capacity. This current review also identified several shortcomings around the quality of writing as well as sufficient detail to support certain claims and conclusions, especially around issues of sustainability. Until quality evaluations of CS activities are better documented, future CS activities for SBCC will find it difficult to identify effective CS approaches and demonstrate their contribution to improved SBCC in LMICs. The review discusses several implications and offers practical recommendations regarding ways to improve the evaluation of CS activities in SBCC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Awantang, G. N., Helland, A., Velu, S., & Gurman, T. (2022). Evaluating capacity strengthening for social and behavior change communication: A systematic review. Health Promotion International, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daab068

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free