Problem drinking as a risk factor for tuberculosis: A propensity score matched analysis of a national survey

9Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Epidemiological and other evidence strongly supports the hypothesis that problem drinking is causally related to the incidence of active tuberculosis and the worsening of the disease course. The presence of a large number of potential confounders, however, complicates the assessment of the actual size of this causal effect, leaving room for a substantial amount of bias. This study aims to contribute to the understanding of the role of confounding in the observed association between problem drinking and tuberculosis, assessing the effect of the adjustment for a relatively large number of potential confounders on the estimated prevalence odds ratio of tuberculosis among problem drinkers vs. moderate drinkers/abstainers in a cross-sectional, nationally representative sample of the South African adult population. Methods. A propensity score approach was used to match each problem drinker in the sample with a subset of moderate drinkers/abstainers with similar characteristics in respect to a set of potential confounders. The prevalence odds ratio of tuberculosis between the matched groups was then calculated using conditional logistic regression. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the results in respect to misspecification of the model. Results: The prevalence odds ratio of tuberculosis between problem drinkers and moderate drinkers/abstainers was 1.97 (95% CI: 1.40 to 2.77), and the result was robust with respect to the matching procedure as well as to incorrect adjustment for potential mediators and to the possible presence of unmeasured confounders. Sub-population analysis did not provide noteworthy evidence for the presence of interaction between problem drinking and the observed confounders. Conclusion: In a cross-sectional national survey of the adult population of a middle income country with high tuberculosis burden, problem drinking was associated with a two fold increase in the odds of past TB diagnosis after controlling for a large number of socio-economic and biological confounders. Within the limitations of a cross-sectional study design with self-reported tuberculosis status, these results adds to previous evidence of a causal link between problem drinking and tuberculosis, and suggest that the observed higher prevalence of tuberculosis among problem drinkers commonly found in population studies cannot be attributed to the confounding effect of the uneven distribution of other risk factors. © 2013 Cois and Ehrlich; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects

21130Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies

8442Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Variable selection for propensity score models

1686Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Spatial transmission and meteorological determinants of tuberculosis incidence in Qinghai Province, China: A spatial clustering panel analysis

71Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Exploration of ecological factors related to the spatial heterogeneity of tuberculosis prevalence in P. R. China

49Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Alcohol consumption and risk of tuberculosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

48Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cois, A., & Ehrlich, R. (2013). Problem drinking as a risk factor for tuberculosis: A propensity score matched analysis of a national survey. BMC Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-871

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 24

63%

Researcher 10

26%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 20

57%

Social Sciences 8

23%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

11%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free