Short Selling: The Impact of SEC Rule 201 of 2010

15Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Despite its sizeable compliance costs, we are unable to document any clear benefits of SEC Rule 201 in ensuring fair valuations and price stability, promoting higher liquidity and execution quality, or preventing a sudden flash crash or prolonged market crises. Our daily and intraday analysis of data both before and after Rule 201 finds that short sellers are naturally more active before the occurrence of negative returns, not after significant price declines. Our simulation results show that Rule 201 further curtails short selling during normal periods, but is not binding on short sellers during the volatile period of the 2008 financial crisis. © 2012, The Eastern Finance Association.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jain, C., Jain, P., & Mcinish, T. H. (2012). Short Selling: The Impact of SEC Rule 201 of 2010. Financial Review, 47(1), 37–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6288.2011.00320.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free