Polypharmacy leads to increased prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication in the indonesian geriatric population visiting primary care facilities

32Citations
Citations of this article
117Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The geriatric population is particularly vulnerable to being prescribed potentially inappropriate medication (PIM); however, the prevalence of this occurrence remains poorly investigated in Indonesia. Thus in this research, we focused on investigating the prevalence and predictors of PIM among the Indonesian geriatric population in a primary health care setting. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted in 25 primary health care facilities in Karawang District, Indonesia. The medical prescriptions of patients aged ≥60 years during January–December 2014 were documented, and the PIM was assessed based on Beers and McLeod criteria. The influence of age, sex, number of diseases, and polypharmacy toward PIM was assessed using a logistic regression model. A P-value of,0.05 defined statistical significance. Results: A total of 3,819 subjects were included in the study. PIM was highly prevalent (52.2%) among the Indonesian elderly. Chlorpheniramine, mefenamic acid, ibuprofen, and nifedipine were the most commonly prescribed PIM. Polypharmacy (odds ratio: 1.2 [0.6, 2.1]) was the only factor associated with the use of PIM, while sex, age, and multiple diseases did not show significant association. Conclusion: PIM is a concern in the Indonesian geriatric population. Health care professionals are encouraged to review the medications of their geriatric patients using updated safety guidelines to prevent risks associated with PIM.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abdulah, R., Insani, W. N., Destiani, D. P., Rohmaniasari, N., Mohenathas, N. D., & Barliana, M. I. (2018). Polypharmacy leads to increased prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication in the indonesian geriatric population visiting primary care facilities. Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, 14, 1591–1597. https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S170475

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free