Computational analysis workshop: Comparing four approaches to melodic analysis

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We compare four computational approaches of melodic analysis according to diverse approach aspects: input type (monophonic or polyphonic), pattern identification type (strict or similar), analysis segmentation, aim of approach, motivic pattern representation, and type of result representations. The considered four computational approaches are the following: a similarity neighbourhood approach by Adiloglu (Adiloglu and Obermayer 2006a, b), a multiple viewpoint representation and discovery approach by Anagnostopoulou (Anagnostopoulou, Share and Conklin 2006), a topological approach by Buteau (2005), and an approach based on multidimensional closed pattern mining by Lartillot (Lartillot and Toiviainen 2007). © 2009 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Buteau, C., Adiloĝlu, K., Lartillot, O., & Anagnostopoulou, C. (2009). Computational analysis workshop: Comparing four approaches to melodic analysis. In Communications in Computer and Information Science (Vol. 37 CCIS, pp. 247–249). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04579-0_24

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free